Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Carboniferous
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Cambrian
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Shuangtasi Formation

Shuangtasi Fm


Period: 
Paleogene

Age Interval: 
Late Paleocene, (23a)


Province: 
Anhui

Type Locality and Naming

The naming section is located in the vicinity of Yangongqiao-Shuangtasi west of Xuancheng City, Anhui, and the reference section is located at Luosigang and other places ~12 km east of Xuancheng. Named the Shuangtasi Group by the Anhui Regional Geological Survey Party in 1974.

Synonymy: Shuangta Fm


Lithology and Thickness

Lower part is purplish red conglomerate, no fossil being seen. Middle part, purplish red, muddy sandstone and sandy mudstone with grayish yellow, grayish white and yellowish green sandstone. Upper part is purplish red or brownish red, pebbly sandstone, sandy mudstone and mudstone. The thickness is ~200–760 m.


Lithology Pattern: 
Coarse-grained sandstone


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

The formation has a disconformable or unconformable contact (?) with the underlying Upper Cretaceous.

Upper contact

Regional extent

It is distributed at Gucun, Shuangtasi, Yusantang, Luosigang and Magushan in the suburbs of Xuancheng City. According to the data, similar horizons are also exposed at Wuhu, Nanling and other areas along the Yangtze River of Anhui Province.


GeoJSON

null

Fossils

The fossils of the Shuangtasi Formation are restricted in its middle and upper part. The mammals mainly include Hsiuannania maguensis, Archaeolambda yangtzeensis, Dissacus magushanensis and Bothriostylops progressus; ostracods are marked by an assemblage represented by Sinocypris funingensis, Neomonoceratina bullata and Cypris decaryi; the gastropods are represented by the Multiscapta rara-Ganeselloides sulcatus assemblage; and charophytes are represented by such genera and species as Peckichara anhuiensis, Grovesichara changzhouensis and Neochara huananensis.


Age 

Its age was previously considered to be late Late Paleocene or Early Eocene (Zheng JiaJian et al., 1999). Recent studies assign this formation to Late Paleocene corresponding to the Thanetian Stage (Li et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019).

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Thanetian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.0

    Beginning date (Ma): 
59.24

    Ending stage: 
Thanetian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
1.0

    Ending date (Ma):  
56.00

Depositional setting

It is generally considered that the formation is fluvial-lacustrine deposits.


Depositional pattern:  

Additional Information


Compiler:  

Tao Deng, Yuanqing Wang, Qian Li, et al.